Orson Welles to Rita Hayworth: “You are my life — my very life.”

February 27th, 2010

On September 7, 1943, the 28-year old Orson Welles secretly whisked Rita Hayworth, 25, away from the Columbia studio lot after the day’s shooting on the Columbia musical, Cover Girl. At Santa Monica City Hall, Orson Welles and Rita Hayworth were married in the presence of best man, Joseph Cotten.

The marriage between Welles and Hayworth would last less than four years, but it certainly burned brightly while it lasted, as the love letters Welles wrote to his new bride attest. A cache of the love letters and drawings Welles wrote to Hayworth were discovered in a secret compartment of Rita’s make-up case, so she obviously treasured them long after her marriage to Welles had ended in divorce. They were sold on September 20, 2001 at a Christie’s auction in Los Angeles, where they fetched $25,850 and are now part of the Welles collection at the Lilly Library in Indiana.

Here is the description taken from the Christie’s auction catalogue, including excerpts from the letters Welles wrote:

RITA HAYWORTH LOVE LETTERS FROM HUSBAND ORSON WELLES

Rita Hayworth’s traveling makeup case, custom made by John Frederics, brown suede over board construction, with upper and lower tiers. The top tier features two side panels which lifts horizontally, and a center mirrored panel which elevates vertically. Inside are five monogrammed makeup containers and a hair brush and comb, strapped into place. The case has a brass plaque with the star’s name on the top, with a suede overcase which secures with snaps. A second set of latches secures a large lower cloth-lined compartment in which were stashed a cache of beautiful love letters and sketches from Rita Hayworth’s husband Orson Welles. This archive comprises 8 autograph letters signed to a total of 23 pages, quarto, octavo and one 12mo, most New York, various dates in 1943, with 8 autograph envelopes addressed to Mrs. Orson Welles, most additionally signed “Orson Welles” on the verso, with three watercolor sketches depicting a miserable young husband separated from his wife by work. There are also two autograph cards which accompanied flowers, and a color portrait captioned “Another self-portrait of self-pity. …We’re way over budget.”


EXCERPTS FROM LETTERS BY ORSON WELLES TO RITA HAYWORTH:

Dearest Angel Girl:

…I suppose most of us are lonely in this big world, but we must fall tremendously in love to find it out. The cure is the discovery of our need for company — I mean company in the very special sense we’ve come to understand since we happened to each other — you and I. The pleasures of human experience are emptied away without that companionship — now that I’ve known it; without it joy is just an unendurable as sorrow. You are my life — my very life. Never imagine your hope approximates what you are to me. Beautiful, precious little baby — hurry up the sun! — make the days shorter till we meet. I love you, that’s all there is to it.

Your boy,

Orson

*************************

Dearest Baby:

I knew it would be lonely — but this is even lonelier that I let myself fear …I’m too blue for anything but the sonorous repetition of my love for you – Oh how much there is of it …I worked ’till midnight …and what happened to me …Ms. Parsons (NY gossip columnist) sat at a table by the door so I made Lennie (Leonard Lyons – columnist for The N.Y. Post) write an avadavat to my innocence – in case she prints I’m out on the town without you.

*************************

The avadavat by Leonard Lyons is written in pencil on the verso of a Stork Club chit.

It states:

I Leonard Lyons, being duly sworn, declare and say:

1. That I am a MALE.

2. That I phoned Orson Welles at 12:30 (a.m.) and asked him to meet me at the Stork Club.

3. That I have known him for 9 years, was his press agent without fear, and he cannot in all decency refuse me.

4. That we are sitting here alone, just we two, drinking COFFEE.

5. That Orson has refused to meet me in any more public places until the arrival of you, his wife.

Sworn before me this 25th day of October, 1943

Leonard Lyons

The avadavat is countersigned by columnist Walter Winchell as a witness. Earlier that same night, Orson Welles addressed a Free World dinner at the Pennsylvania Hotel in New York City.

*************************

Welles has written on the back of the letter:

This is going to be my last saloon ’till you get here.

3:30 (a.m.) (coffee kicking in) The late traffic yawns in the echoing streets below –

The wind whistles – the rain drips

Look I can’t even write!

Sweet one – I can’t live without – you!

*************************

Film Streams and Omaha Steaks presents a “Great Directors” retrospective of the films of Orson Welles, February 18 to March 19 in Omaha, Nebraska

February 20th, 2010

Thanks to Todd Clark for posting the information about a Welles retrospective in Omaha, Nebraska, on the Wellesnet Facebook page.

Personally, I find it very encouraging that Omaha has a theatre that is willing to devote a whole series of films to Orson Welles. This is even more amazing to me, since a few years ago I couldn’t get the people in charge of the San Francisco Film Festival to devote any kind of retrospective program to Orson Welles. The reason, while not explicitly stated to me, seemed to be quite obvious: Such a program would not make any money!

Unfortunately, I must agree. Just look at the box-office returns for Me and Orson Welles.

Which is why I have to commend Film Streams in Omaha for mounting such a series.

Let’s face it, if a Orson Welles retrospective can’t sell out theatres in San Francisco and Los Angeles, just imagine the financial risks a small theatre in Omaha will be taking!

So, anyone reading this in Omaha, please support the program of Welles Films!

I must also say, I had the most delicious Filet Mignon steaks I’ve ever tasted, that came from Omaha Steaks, of Nebraska, when I got them sent to me as a Christmas gift about ten years ago. I found they were much better than the $50. Fillet Minion’s I had eaten at Ernie’s here in San Francisco (famous from Vertigo), or at The House of Prime Rib. Whether Orson Welles himself would have endorsed them over his nightly meal at Ma Maison, I have no idea, but my educated guess is that, after tasting them, and getting a free supply, he would have been happy to do a commercial for Omaha Steaks. I also think another actor-gourmet, Vincent Price would have been up for an endorsement of Omaha Steaks, as well, since like Welles, he was from the midwest (St. Louis).

While not a complete Welles’s retrospective, the Film Streams Program include both The Trial and F For Fake. So let me once again thank the programmers at Film Streams for taking such a bold step.

Not that The Trial or F For Fake are anything less than cinematic masterpieces, but having run a repertory theater myself, you still want to break even, or at least have a few people in the audience!

___________

The Omaha Film Streams Series is generously sponsored by:

OMAHA STEAKS

THE SEVEN ORSON WELLES FILMS IN THE RETROSPECTIVE INCLUDE:

*****


CITIZEN KANE
THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS
THE STRANGER
THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI
TOUCH OF EVIL
THE TRIAL
F FOR FAKE

*****

ORSON WELLES is “enourmosly impressive” in the Peter Brook production of Shakespeare’s KING LEAR now out on DVD

February 11th, 2010

The Archive of American Television in partnership with E1 Entertainment has just released Orson Welles 1953 Television debut as King Lear in a deluxe DVD package. It is highly recommended, since although this historic TV show is still mastered from a kinescope copy, it looks far better than the blurry VHS copies that have long been in circulation.

The DVD also comes with over 90-minutes of bonus features, including:

* A 5-minute preview of King Lear, including rehearsal footage of the blinding of Glouster’s eyes, along with interviews with director Peter Brook and composer Virgil Thompson. Peter Brook also shows us a series of drawings, (presumably rendered by production designer Henry May), which are much more detailed and elaborate then what eventually ended up in the production itself. See a excerpt on YouTube HERE.

* A discussion on staging Shakespeare by Walter Kerr, including scenes from Hamlet.

* A 43-minute report from the Yale University Shakespeare Festival in 1954 by Omnibus host Alastair Cooke.

* Dr. Frank Baxter on the Globe Theater, with Mr. Baxter explaining William Shakespeare’s famed theatre (10 minutes).

* A nicely designed 16-page booklet with rare photos taken during the performance, and a comprehensive background essay by Simon Callow, along with a short introduction from director Peter Brook, who relates his memories of working with Orson Welles.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Here is a review of King Lear that appeared in The New York Herald-Tribune:


ORSON WELLES AS KING LEAR ON TV IS IMPRESSIVE


By John Crosby

October 22, 1953 – The New York Herald Tribune

Orson Welles, a great ham of an actor, undertook the role of King Lear, a great ham of a part, on Omnibus last Sunday and was, I thought, enormously impressive. This was the great Orson’s television debut and it was a fortunate inspiration to cast him as Lear. No other part is big enough for Welles who suffers from gigantism of manner and mind.

Welles, whose five year sojourn abroad has added quite a lot of poundage to his face and the rest of him, was every inch a king, a phrase that came from Lear, and his voice, a redoubtable organ, was superb in declaiming some of the most sweeping poetry in all of Shakespeare.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Wellesnet message board will continue at the Wellesnet Facebook page

February 6th, 2010

Since the Wellenset message board has now been officially closed down, I have already received several e-mails about continuing it elsewhere.

As a short term solution, I have set up some topic pages on all of Orson Welles’s major films at the Wellesnet Facebook page, so all Wellenet members who wish to continue to discuss Welles can do so.

You can access the discussion board HERE.

Eventually, what I would ideally like to do is either start a new message board, or re-open the original board by buying it outright from Jeff. Buying the old board would make the most sense, as the original board has over 18,000 posts making it a valuable collective resource on the life and work of Orson Welles.

I would take over the “thankless” job as the main moderator for either a new message board, or the re-opening of the old one, and then would advertise for volunteers to act as assistant moderators.

To do this, it appears that we will once again need to ask readers to contribute donations. I’m sure that collectively we can easily raise the money to do so, as I’ve already heard from several important friends of Wellesnet who have offered strong words of support and financial commitment, including Simon Callow and Christopher Welles Feder.

I will be making a more formal plea for donations shortly, but in the meantime, anyone who wishes to help with suggestions, ideas, or volunteer as an assistant moderator, please feel free to write to me.

Sincerely,

Lawrence French

________________________
e-mail: lrfrench@yahoo.com

* * * * *

Christian McKay on playing Orson Welles – Part III

February 4th, 2010

The members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences have voted on this years nominees, and Christian McKay’s performance as Orson Welles has not been nominated.

This is not really too much of a surprise, since there was absolutely no support for the film in terms of trade ads, or given the fact that everyone at Russell Schwartz’s Anemic Marketing screwed things up so badly. Pandemic Marketing can now be branded as the Peppercorn-Wormser of this decade. A crew of publicity hacks who know next to nothing about the work of Orson Welles! I’d like to suggest that all independent producers hire them for their next project, especially if you want to have a huge failure!

Meanwhile, getting back to the actual Academy Award nominations, I found the selections to be quite interesting, especially since from my own ten-best list, every one of my choices received one or more nominations, excepting of course, Me and Orson Welles.

However as Christian McKay recently wrote to me, “the work is it’s own reward.” It certainly should not be based on the baubles and trinkets of getting any kind of award after the fact.

That may be true, but I still hoped Christian McKay would get nominated. I even thought I might bring him some good luck, because I had talked extensively with Martin Landau before he won the Oscar for playing another actor in Tim Burton’s Ed Wood. I also spoke to two-time supporting actor Peter Ustinov, when he visited San Francisco during the restoration showing of Stanley Kubrick’s Spartacus and he explained in great detail what happened on the night of his first Oscar win in 1960.

In any event, the Academy did nominate the great Canadian actor, Christopher Plummer, after 52 years of being in the wilderness. Ironically, Mr. Plummer’s movie debut came in the same year as Welles’s Touch of Evil, for playing the early environmental crusader Walt Murdock in Nicholas Ray’s Wind Across The Everglades. Of course, neither Touch of Evil or Wind across the Everglades was nominated for a single Oscar in 1958. Gigi, however, won (at the time) a record nine Oscars that year. Which is why nobody I know really takes the Academy Awards very seriously.

Christopher Plummer, it should be noted, was a big fan of Orson Welles, although they never got to work together on a movie. But in 1967, after Welles met Plummer on the set of Oedipus Rex, in Greece, he asked Plummer to play Marc Antony in a proposed film version of Julius Caesar, with Paul Scofield as Brutus and Welles playing Caesar. Of course, that project never happened, but Plummer would have been a ready and willing participant to appear with Welles, even if there was no money to pay his salary!

Naturally, the money never did appear, and a few years later there was a terrible movie version made of Julius Caesar. It featured several actors Welles knew and had directed beforehand, including Charlton Heston, John Gielgud and Christopher Lee. Ironically, both Heston and Gielgud were great fans of Welles work as a director of Shakespeare, so one has to wonder why they didn’t try to get Welles to direct this awful film version of Julius Caesar, rather than Stuart Burge!

Since Christopher Plummer was such a great fan of Welles, I find it especially interesting that he should be nominated this year for playing the great genius of letters that was Leo Tolstoy. Here is what Plummer told Susan King at The Los Angeles Times, about playing Tolstoy:

CHRISTOPHER PLUMMER: How do you play a genius? It’s impossible. And how do you write a script about a genius? Since you can’t play a genius, you play absolutely the opposite, and that’s what I tried to do with Michael (Hoffman’s) encouragement. Playing great people or greatly fascinating historical figures, the way to do it is to play against it.

Now with Leo Tolstoy as a prelude, here is part three of my talk with Christian McKay about playing another genius of the arts…

*****

LAWRENCE FRENCH: Did you use anything you learned from other directors you worked with for creating the role of Orson Welles as a stage director?

CHRISTIAN McKAY: No, because I have never worked with a director who came anywhere near the Old Man. Richard is the closest. He carries the film in his head like Orson, but is very different in personality.

LAWRENCE FRENCH: You’ve also played a stage director before this in the play Memory, which was seen off-Broadway.

CHRISTIAN McKAY: Yes, and perhaps I will be a director of actors someday. I hope my little production company, Atomic80, can put on my revised Orson Welles play, Moby Dick Re-Rehearsed. Norman Lloyd wants me to play in Galileo, by Bertold Brecht, which he produced with Jack Houseman, that was directed by Joseph Losey and starred Charles Laughton. Norman has also suggested a marvelous Chekhov short story as a one-man show for me and I would love to direct Under Milk Wood by Dylan Thomas. There are lots of possibilities, but first things first and this year it is my Goyescas documentary.

Read the rest of this entry »