Erich Von Stroheim on CITIZEN KANE

Discuss what many consider the greatest film ever made

Erich Von Stroheim on CITIZEN KANE

Postby Wellesnet » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:10 pm

From film critic Fred Camper's website:

http://www.fredcamper.com/M/VonStroheim.html
Wellesnet
Member
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 7:38 pm

Re: Erich Von Stroheim on CITIZEN KANE

Postby Roger Ryan » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:08 am

I've read this review before and it's a fairly astute one. Surprisingly, Stroheim dislikes the subject matter and script or, rather, feels that the story is too trite and not presented well. One would imagine that the man who bucked Hollywood tradition just as it was forming and thought that a six hour-plus cut was the way to present GREED would be more receptive to the structure of KANE. His criticism of repetitious scenes appears to be based on one of the film's greatest strengths: it's ability to replay events in Kane's life to show subtly different interpretations of its protagonist. However, in mid-review he begins addressing the technical aspect of KANE, as well as the performances, and becomes effusive in his praise. By the end he's calling it a "great picture" that will go down in history! At first, one suspects that Stroheim is simply jealous of this upstart Welles, but the balance of the review makes the entirety feel more even-handed.
Roger Ryan
Wellesnet Advanced
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 10:09 am

Re: Erich Von Stroheim on CITIZEN KANE

Postby mteal » Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:18 am

His complaint about the film's structure would probably have been echoed by many average filmgoers at the time, but "jealous" is a word that comes to my mind too when I read Von Stroheim's review. He seems to be thinking "I need to take this punk down a peg or two before I praise him." It reminds me a bit of D.W. Griffith's reaction to KANE: "I like CITIZEN KANE...especially all the things in it that were stolen from me." Of course, Welles's belittling of the director's role later in life - along with his effusive praise of actors - suggests he may have been jealous himself of all the young hotshot directors who were flying high in Hollywood in the early to mid-70's, without doing anything in front of the camera.
User avatar
mteal
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2001 11:31 pm

Re: Erich Von Stroheim on CITIZEN KANE

Postby mido505 » Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:39 pm

I wonder if Welles read that review, because the writer/director of THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS seems to have taken some of Von Stroheim's criticisms to heart, working on a broader social canvas, with more purity and simplicity and less "bric a brac", and greater sympathy for even the most unsympathetic characters. I think Von Stroheim would have loved the uncut Ambersons.

Odd, how much these two have in common.

Welles spoke very highly of Von Stroheim in THIS IS ORSON WELLES.
mido505
Wellesnet Veteran
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:24 pm

Re: Erich Von Stroheim on CITIZEN KANE

Postby mteal » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:06 am

I'd like to know his thoughts on any other Welles film, but yes, AMBERSONS would be especially interesting, since that was also Welles's diploma, so to speak, from the Von Stroheim school of film maudit.
User avatar
mteal
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2001 11:31 pm


Return to Citizen Kane

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron