Unique review of MR ARKADIN - from UK 1974

Discuss Welles's other European films.
User avatar
Jeff Wilson
Wellesnet Advanced
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 7:21 pm
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Postby Jeff Wilson » Tue May 16, 2006 1:06 pm

It doesn't irk me at all. I am simply presenting material supporting the opposite view. Sorry if my sarcasm offends. You've commented that a bootleg copy of the film is superior to the DVD; every bootleg I've seen has been a washed out looking mess, so let's say I'm dubious as to whether that is the way the film is supposed to look.

My comment about the gay KANE character was that anyone working in Hollywood at that time would hardly write a script with a flaming homosexual as lead and expect it to get made. Such characters were present in films of the time, but to expect such a film to be made by someone in Welles' particular position at that time is pushing things a bit. There's nothing "irked" about that view, to my eyes.

Tony
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 11:44 pm

Postby Tony » Tue May 16, 2006 5:24 pm

Jeff:

Here's a picture of Welles and Moreau on the set of Immortal: that is one huge camara! Is this what Kurant was talking about, or was this a typical colour camera at the time? When one compares this to the much smaller cameras he used for It's All True and Othello, the difference is startling.


http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/cteq/01/17/immortal.html

User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1091
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby jaime marzol » Tue May 16, 2006 7:35 pm

jeff said:
It doesn't irk me at all. I am simply presenting material supporting the opposite view.

i said:
your presentation of facts on IMMORTAL STORY you offered with great authority, without ever looking at what i found.
you are comfortable quoting 2nd, 3rd, and 4th hand sources to discredit my find, rather that to ask me to send you a copy to see if i found what i think i found.

when you let petty feelings ifluence you opinions here, you cheat your members, and your site.

WILSON:
you've commented that a bootleg copy of the film is superior to the DVD; every bootleg I've seen has been a washed out looking mess, so let's say I'm dubious as to whether that is the way the film is supposed to look.

ME:
yes, bootlegs are better than DVDS, and vacation flights will be available to the noon by sept. get real.

what you think i said doesn't make any f*cking sense?

i said the vhs is dramatic, and beutiful towatch with very cool tints, and excellent lighting. stuff that is nowhere in the DVD.

But since you are the psychic detective, and you know what i found is bullshit, i will just chuck it in the garbage now, because jeff knows all.

User avatar
Jeff Wilson
Wellesnet Advanced
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 7:21 pm
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Postby Jeff Wilson » Tue May 16, 2006 8:00 pm

If there was a shrugging smiley, you would see it inserted here. I'm not sure why you're so bothered, to be honest. My comments came from what I have seen (the Italian DVD, a theatrical screening, two bootleg tapes (clearly suffering from generational degradation) and a bootleg DVD (also suffering from degradation), but no, not your tape), which I have repeatedly stated. I have never said that you are wrong and I am right. I am sorry if what I stated came across with too much authority; I'll be sure to qualify everything in the future.

Why don't you provide screen captures of your copy? I will post them on the site. People can look for themselves, if they even care. If you do, great. If you don't, great. This is not a vital issue one way or the other to me.

User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1091
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby jaime marzol » Tue May 16, 2006 9:58 pm

i would like to tell you that everything you post is full of shit, but i don't. I have more self control than you have.

if some one posts here, "hey, i found such and such." my first instinct is to see what i have that i can offer for trade.

you and glenn's first instinct is to degrade.

why be ugly when it's just as easy to be informative, and interested?

User avatar
Jeff Wilson
Wellesnet Advanced
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 7:21 pm
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Postby Jeff Wilson » Tue May 16, 2006 10:33 pm

i would like to tell you that everything you post is full of shit, but i don't


The feeling is mutual.

I have more self control than you have.


Of course you do.

If you want to continue this, do it off the board. I'm leaving the thread open on the off chance someone wants to continue the original conversation; if this line of discussion continues, I'll lock it.

Tony
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 11:44 pm

Postby Tony » Tue May 16, 2006 10:53 pm

Hey, I still wanna know about that big honkin camera!:p

User avatar
Jeff Wilson
Wellesnet Advanced
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 7:21 pm
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Postby Jeff Wilson » Tue May 16, 2006 11:05 pm

I'll see what else the article says.

Tony
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 11:44 pm

Postby Tony » Tue May 16, 2006 11:24 pm

Thanks Jeff! :;):

User avatar
ToddBaesen
Wellesnet Advanced
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2001 12:00 am
Location: San Francisco

Postby ToddBaesen » Tue May 16, 2006 11:35 pm

Jeff:

Was there much more of Willy Kurant's comments about woriking with Welles on I. Story, and if there was, can you post any more of it?

Thanks.
Todd

User avatar
Jeff Wilson
Wellesnet Advanced
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 7:21 pm
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Postby Jeff Wilson » Tue May 16, 2006 11:55 pm

Yeah, there's plenty. He also covers working briefly on THE HEROINE, which was to paired with IS to make it feature length, and also discusses THE DEEP. I'll try to type up some of the better stuff tomorrow. I'll find the full citation in case anyone wants to find the full article.

Tony
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 11:44 pm

Postby Tony » Wed May 17, 2006 12:26 am

Jeff: this would be fantastic if you have the time to do this: it just occurred to me that Kurant was Welles's cinematographer for 3 years, as The Heroine and Immortal were both filmed in 1966, and The Deep was filmed from 66-69, I believe. do you know if Kurant lensed Merchant also?

Looking forward to this!
Tony :laugh:

User avatar
Jeff Wilson
Wellesnet Advanced
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 7:21 pm
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Postby Jeff Wilson » Wed May 17, 2006 9:33 am

To be honest, I loathe transcribing, so I will scan the pages and see if I can make a PDF out of it. Those interested can send me an email requesting it or something. That way, the whole article can be read.

User avatar
Clive Dale
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Postby Clive Dale » Wed May 17, 2006 11:42 pm

Jeff,

I was sad to read your post about your disenchantment with the Board.
You've done so much through the years to help build knowledge and understanding of Welles.
We've all benefitted from your efforts.

Thank You.

The Night Man
Wellesnet Veteran
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:07 am
Location: USA

Postby The Night Man » Thu May 18, 2006 2:45 am

Clive Dale wrote:Jeff,

I was sad to read your post about your disenchantment with the Board.
You've done so much through the years to help build knowledge and understanding of Welles.
We've all benefitted from your efforts.

Thank You.


Ditto, Jeff. I sincerely hope that your disenchantment/unhappiness with the board is a passing thing and you will feel differently after some consideration.


Return to “Mr. Arkadin, The Trial, The Immortal Story”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest