Postby Wich2 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:22 pm
>I used the Vidal comparison because he uses John Hays' diaries to illustrate that Lincoln in private could actually be a bit of a character, a compulsive storyteller for example, not entirely the grave and somber tragic figure as Welles presents him. Your broadcast captures some of that lighter spirit.<
Thanks. I tried for that in the writing and the playing, as it is borne out by countless first-hand memories in the historical record. And as I wrote here before in the thread about the Mercury LINCOLN, the stentorian take on the character that Orson chose - though he was not alone in that choice, in that era - is really off-base.
>No question he was a complex and mysterious man, though, and there are those who still consider the dark side of Lincoln's presidency.<
Well, complex as many of we fellow humans are! Probably manic depressive, and with somewhat clumsy interactions with the opposite sex.
"Dark," I do not see in his Presidency, though; a bit "hard," yes, in some of his war-fighting measures.
>Here's a documentary on the assassination that features Welles nemesis Charles Hingham - at about the 21 minute mark - offering his own conspiracy theory about what happened:<
Higham's not the most respected author! But as Tony says, there most emphatically was a conspiracy - the government was very upfront about that in the trials afterwards. What isn't documented well, is how many Secesh sympathizers like Sanders were involved behind the scenes, or at least knew more than they admitted to publicly.
-Craig