Alternate "Journey Into Fear" Edit Discovered

Journey into Fear, Jane Eyre, Black Magic, The Third Man, others
Roger Ryan
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1090
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 10:09 am

Postby Roger Ryan » Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:41 pm

Hello all! As Jeff alluded to in his Locarno post, we discovered something quite unexpected at the festival - an alternate version of "Journey Into Fear" which could very well be the Welles-approved one completed according to his specifications while he was in South America.

Stefan Droessler, head of the Munich Filmmuseum and organizer of the Locarno retrospective, made mention last Thursday afternoon that he had received a new print of the film from Germany, so I decided to attend the showing that evening mainly to check out its quality. Within a couple of moments, I realized I was watching a version of Welles' third R.K.O. production that I had never seen before! While the length of the film is only approximately three minutes longer, the tone and flow of the film is quite different than the version we've always known and I suspect that if it's not the original version Welles wanted released, then it is one that is much closer to it than what came out in '42. The biggest clue is in the credits which describe the film as "A Mercury Production By Orson Welles" and credit the screenplay to both Welles and Joseph Cotten (you may recall that the official released version states the film is simply "A Mercury Production" and credits only Cotten with the screenplay). This suggests that Welles asked for his name to be removed as producer and screenwriter after R.K.O. recut the film.

I hope to be able to go into more detail at a later date, but here's the differences that stood out in my mind:

1) The credits are reportedly at the very beginning of the film prior to the scene with Jack Moss as Peter Benat loading his gun in the hotel room. I say "reportedly" because Stefan told me that the gentleman who provided the print changed the placement of the credits himself because he was only familiar with the general release version which featured the hotel room scene as a prologue, and thought this print was in error for placing the credits prior to this scene.

2) A simple map establishing the story's location as "Istanbul" appears on-screen, then wipes off in a fashion which provides a fluid transition into the opening crane shot which takes us to the window of Benat's hotel room.

3) Joseph Cotten as Howard Graham does not provide any narration in this version of the film! Instead, the hotel lobby scene, the encounter and subsequent dinner with Kopeikin (Everett Sloane) and the visit to the cabaret are all longer, revealing the plot through dialogue and action. Most notable during these early sequences is how Sloane's character is more developed and is played for more laughs.

4) The introduction of Colonel Haki (Welles) is also extended and he delivers one anecdote regarding soldiers dying for a cause which was cut from the general release version.

5) I was quite excited to see a previously unknown scene between Haki and Graham's wife (Ruth Warrick) which takes place in her hotel room after Graham has been sent away on the steamer. Played almost exclusively for laughs, Haki insinuates that Graham may have left because of a woman, then starts making moves on Warrick! This establishes a relationship which adds more humor to the scene near the film's end when Graham learns that his wife has invited Haki to dinner.

6) The biggest changes in editing occur during the shipboard sequences. All of these play much smoother than in the release version. Significantly, at one point prior to the character of Benat appearing in the dining area, the skipping record that played in the film's opening scene can be heard as Graham climbs the stairs to the second deck. He doesn't recognize the importance of the recording, but the audience does and it helps to create some more suspense.

7) As I mentioned, the editing is less abrupt during the shipboard scenes. I was astonished to find a very well-shot scene showing Graham leaving his room, stubbing out his cigarette, and walking slowly down the hall to the room of Kevetli (Haki's appointed spy). The camera tracks backward in front of Cotten at an unsettling tilted angle which helps to build suspense before Kevetli's body is discovered (in the released version, the scene simply fades in as Graham discovers the corpse with no preparation at all).

8) The film's ending is in step with the more humorous tone of this alternate version. After both Muller and Benat have been shot and/or fallen to their deaths, Graham remains on the hotel ledge as his wife looks up at him in the rain. "Howard, is that you?," she says. "Get down off that ledge this minute!" The camera then cuts to Cotten who has a look of chagrin on his face as he peers down at his wife and the scene fades out followed by "The End".

Reportedly, Welles was disgusted with how sloppy the film had been re-edited when he returned from South America and insisted on adding Cotten's narration to clarify infomation that had been cut and giving the film the new ending we've always known where Haki kids Graham about his wife (interestingly, one persumes Benat has killed Haki in the early version since we don't see him again). It's open to argument whether the new Welles' directed ending is superior to the one I just described, but there is no question that the overall continuity and pacing is better in the version of the film I saw Thursday night than the one I've been familiar with for the last twenty-five years.

So why hasn't this alternate version been acknowledged earlier? I don't think the film is held in very high esteem by Welles' fans and this early cut just kind of slipped under the radar. After the Locarno showing, I asked Stefan immediately if he knew that he had hold of an early cut of the film and he professed that he wasn't that familiar with "Jouney Into Fear" and did not realize it! He mentioned to me that he was told the credits had been moved so it would more closely resemble the French DVD release's opening which did pique his curiosity (we later reviewed the French "Journey Into Fear" DVD and it is the same general release version available for the last 60 years). Robert Fischer, former head of the Munich Filmmuseum, told me the next day that he believes he saw this alternate version on German TV before, but did not realize it was different from the version most viewers were familiar with. He also recalled reading once that James Naremore was told by someone that there was an alternate German version of "Lady From Shanghai", a version that was never found. "Perhaps he got the title wrong," suggested Robert. "Maybe he meant 'Journey Into Fear' after all".

User avatar
R Kadin
Wellesnet Veteran
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 2:32 pm

Postby R Kadin » Tue Aug 09, 2005 6:28 pm

FanTAStic find, Roger! It's almost like finding a pre-mutilated copy of Ambersons, given that the two were in parallel production together and, if relatively unmolested, might reflect Welles' creativity at the time more faithfully than its unfortunate sibling - in certain respects, of course.


Was there/ is there talk of a new release?

Roger Ryan
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1090
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 10:09 am

Postby Roger Ryan » Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:11 pm

Reportedly, the owner of the negative was alerted to the find a day or two after the screening and is considering a European DVD release. But since the French "Journey Into Fear" DVD containing the general release version just came out recently, there is some question whether there would be a market for a new one so soon.

User avatar
Wilson
Site Admin
Posts: 215
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 1:02 pm

Postby Wilson » Tue Aug 09, 2005 10:03 pm

I picked up the French DVD while in Locarno, and it's a good looking version, I'd say. Hopefully we'll get the other version as well on disc. It hasn't been released anywhere but France, so maybe that bodes well. I didn't remember as much of the film as Roger did, but the new scene with Haki and Stephanie made me sit up, and the ending especially, since I had fairly vivid memories of the one I had seen, with Welles and Cotten. I kept thinking, "this is better than I remember!" and then I found out why...

Gus Moreno
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 6:15 pm

Postby Gus Moreno » Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:28 am

I seem to remember a few years ago reading a post from someone in Australia describing the ending of "Journey Into Fear" as you described it above, Roger. I thought it interesting that there was a different ending for the film, but didn't give it much thought beyond that. They never mentioned the Haki/Stephanie scene or all the other changes you listed though, so it's nice to know there's another, significantly different version out there. I look forward to seeing it sometime.

User avatar
chrissie
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:59 pm
Location: Birmingham, UK

Postby chrissie » Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:35 am

Given that the studio wanted this re-cut and it was a contemporaneous change, how do prints like this manage to escape? Some kind of oversight/accident when shipping the film overseas?

I don't for a second think this gives any glimmer of hope for Ambersons, Stranger and Lady from Shanghai... makes an entertaining fantasy, though.

colwood
Wellesnet Veteran
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:04 pm

Postby colwood » Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:31 pm

Excellent recap Roger. I hope to one day be able to see this version. I wonder if this might re-open the debate on whether JIF should be on included on Welles' filmography as a director?

User avatar
Terry
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1301
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 11:10 pm

Postby Terry » Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:58 pm

Welles always maintained that any credit going for that film was to go to Norman Foster, and wished we could see Foster's original version. I doubt the Locarno version was that original (but could be wrong.) I guess instead that it is RKO's cut, which Welles viewed and subsequently (for whatever reason) altered into the version we're familiar with. If that's the case, does it make the longer version less of a Welles film?

Regarding why that version is floating around Germany, Hollywood studios didn't seem to be too fussy about fine-tuning films for the European market. That cut's done? Send it! They agonized over making the bucks in the US, and tortured celluloid into what they hoped was a more commercial form. That's my guess. It is exciting for that other cut to have surfaced.
Sto Pro Veritate

Roger Ryan
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1090
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 10:09 am

Postby Roger Ryan » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:51 am

Store Hadji - That's the thing I find so fascinating about this version. If in fact the film I saw last Thursday was the recut one that Welles was called back in Oct. of '42 to rework, why would Welles himself go out of his way to wreck the continuity of the shipboard scenes? I can almost understand Welles cutting down the opening scenes to fit in Cotten's narration (although this was not an improvement). I can also understand Welles wanting a new ending and removing the Haki/Stephanie scene, both of which are humorous but not particularly strong. But I cannot fathom the idea that Welles would deliberately disrupt the pacing and continuity of the film by recutting its middle portion. In "This Is Orson Welles", Welles himself says that "Journey Into Fear" looks like it was edited "by a lawnmower"; that description fits the released version better than this alternate edit.

One more thing to murky the waters: Welles claimed he was quite excited about having Benat's hotel room scene play before the credits, thinking that was the first time something like that had been done (he later realized it had been done earlier in "Of Mice & Men"). If, in fact, the credits came prior to this scene in the alternate edit (remember, I was told the gentleman who provided the print cut the credits in after the opening scene himself), that would imply Welles' supposed "innovation" was decided upon during a re-edit. I think we need more details concerning what Welles did to this film in October, 1942!

tony williams
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:45 pm

Postby tony williams » Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:45 pm

It has been many years since I've seen JOURNEY INTO FEAR and I've not viewed a print while in the U.S.A. But Roger's description of the concluding shot strongly ties in to my memory of seeing this scene when BBC TV screened it during the early 1960s.

User avatar
Terry
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1301
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 11:10 pm

Postby Terry » Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:41 am

Yes, Roger, nothing but guesswork to go by. I would suppose further that after Orson had altered the Locarno cut, RKO brought out the knives and did some more postproduction butchering before releasing it. I wonder where Norman Foster was during this process and what he thought of it. Foster probably expected that he would be finishing up Benito while Orson was assembling the rest of It's All True at RKO, but we know the travesty which occured instead. I guess RKO had so little faith in It's All True that they decided to cut their losses and simply stop the whole project where it was. I'm digressing. I wonder if anyone who's been over to Lilly has found any further documents from RKO on what steps were taken in Journey's editing. Kane, Ambersons and It's All True are well documented, but I've never seen much on Journey. Hey, there's a book there! Somebody please start writing!
Sto Pro Veritate

Vidamonte
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2002 5:30 am

Postby Vidamonte » Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:22 pm

Hi,

I was reading this topic with great interest and gradually understood that I have this version on VHS, that I bought from England couple of years ago. There is a logo : 4 Front Video on cover and it is distributed by Polygram Filmed Entertainment (UK) Ltd. It is part of their "Golden Classics"-series.There is text: This program has been transferred from original archive material and therefore, in places, the quality reflects the age of the footage. It is good quality, though.
I don't know about the year of the release, but I quess early 90's. I remember when I watched it, I didn't notice anything, except the ending. That I knew was different from what I had seen before. I just felt kind of happy that I got another version of the movie, but did not think about it much more.I have always enjoyed the movie a lot: espionage story,done tongue-in-cheek in exotic mileau, good cast (enough eccentrics) and when you know that Welles was shooting Ambersons at the same time and ready to go to Brazil and his girlfriend there, too....it is very entertaining package.

Roger Ryan
Wellesnet Legend
Posts: 1090
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 10:09 am

Postby Roger Ryan » Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:37 pm

Vidamonte - Could you confirm the placement of the credits on your tape version? Are they at the beginning of the film or do they follow the Benat hotel room scene? Also, is Welles' name included as producer and writer? Thanks.

Vidamonte
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2002 5:30 am

Postby Vidamonte » Sat Aug 13, 2005 3:33 pm

Roger,

Credits are at the beginning before the Benat hotel room scene and Welles' name is included as producer and writer.

colwood
Wellesnet Veteran
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:04 pm

Postby colwood » Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:18 pm

If in fact it is the alternate edit, here it is,

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec....4945266


Return to “1940s”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest