"Strange that arrival of a storied, unfinished masterpiece by the notoriously talented Orson Welles — a director whose unmade films are just as legendary as the ones he did make — should feel like it came and went with barely any notice, except among critics and hardcore cinephiles..."
Netflix didn't do a very good job of promoting the film, which suggests that, after all the money they heroically put into completing it, the final product may have left them cold. The Netflix debut of Wind was supposed to open up a whole new audience for Welles's work. Sadly, that doesn't appear to have happened. One Spanish language review of the film I read not long ago liked the film, but thought its chief sin was an overdose of subtext. One couldn't expect Netflix's normal audience to be into analyzing that sort of thing. Most of them probably don't have a clue who Antonioni was, and couldn't care less.
Still, it's good to see Wind is appreciated by some influential people out there, and hopefully that will continue to grow. But the film's subtext may have to be debated for years. It may never be unraveled fully. Maybe it can't or shouldn't be.