I was suggesting that his (allegedly) expressed anger was not justified.
Or Jaglom just made up the story that Welles requested to be recorded with a hidden tape recorder. I mean, on the surface, that whole claim sounds fishy: "I made these recordings with a tape recorder hidden away from Welles's sight, but don't worry -- he wanted it that way."
I'm convinced Jaglom just recorded his conversations with Welles for a rainy day, knowing it would bring him some attention if he brought them to light. Nothing more. If he really intended to be respectful to Welles as a friend and filmmaker, he wouldn't have brought along Peter Biskind to contribute a horrific intro (which includes the debunked claim that "Rosebud" was a nickname for Marion Davies's vagina) and a couple of lousy pages of footnotes in the back. (I can't believe Biskind spends a note explaining what a 35mm blimp is, but says nothing about the blacklist.)
The hard evidence is that Welles considered Jaglom his friend on the night Welles died.
He might have called Henry Jaglom his "friend" in that Roger Hill convo because:
1. Roger Hill likely had no idea who Jaglom was, nor what his relationship was to Welles -- Welles would have to fill him in somehow.
2. At the time of making SOMEONE TO LOVE, which Welles wanted to talk about, Welles and Jaglom were, indeed, friends.
3. Welles didn't want to go into details about his recent breakup with Jaglom because he wanted to maintain an optimistic tone.
In that final conversation, Welles wanted to muse about new projects and new horizons. And so, he lied that Jaglom was still a friend.
And by the way, regarding those friends of Welles who said he was betrayed by Jaglom, it would be
very strange if all of them were lying.
Pardon the user name. It's meant to be silly. -- Nic Ciccone